diff --git a/Documentation/DesignRationale.md b/Documentation/DesignRationale.md
index dcc35efa..29f3c6a4 100644
--- a/Documentation/DesignRationale.md
+++ b/Documentation/DesignRationale.md
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ There isn't much you can do with them without figuring out what will be the resu
 
 Will it be `E1`, `E2` or some new `E3` maybe? So you need a new set of operators just to solve that impedance mismatch.
 
-This for sure hurts composition properties, and Rx really doesn't care about why sequence fails, it just forwards failure further.
+This for sure hurts composition properties, and Rx really doesn't care about why sequence fails, it just usually forwards failure further down the observable chain.
 
 There is additional problem that maybe in some cases operators will fail for some internal error, and in that case you won't be able to construct resulting error and report failure.
 
diff --git a/Documentation/GettingStarted.md b/Documentation/GettingStarted.md
index 1e5c3c37..4628c4d4 100644
--- a/Documentation/GettingStarted.md
+++ b/Documentation/GettingStarted.md
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ extension NSObject {
 #endif
 ```
 
-**If Swift compiler doesn't have a way to deduct observed type (return Observable type), it will report error that the function doesn't exists.**
+**If Swift compiler doesn't have a way to deduce observed type (return Observable type), it will report error about function not existing.**
 
 Here are some ways you can give him hints about observed type:
 
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index afaafab0..2a3b9100 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 <img src="assets/Rx_Logo_M.png" width="36" height="36"> RxSwift: ReactiveX for Swift
 ======================================
 
+[![Travis CI](https://travis-ci.org/kzaher/RxSwift.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/kzaher/RxSwift)
+
 Xcode 6.3 / Swift 1.2 required
 
 Rx is a [generic abstraction of computation](https://youtu.be/looJcaeboBY) expressed through `Observable<Element>` interface.