TouchInstinct
/
RxSwift
303
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[GettingStarted] Use canonical way of checking a string for a string

This commit is contained in:
Fernando Paredes 2015-12-18 08:29:02 -08:00
parent 79a079dc49
commit e54fa1f207
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
Documentation/GettingStarted.md
View File

@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ When writing elegant RxSwift/RxCocoa code, you are probably relying heavily on c
```swift
images = word
.filter { $0.rangeOfString("important") != nil }
.filter { $0.containsString("important") }
.flatMap { word in
return self.api.loadFlickrFeed("karate")
.catchError { error in
@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ If compiler reports that there is an error somewhere in this expression, I would
```swift
images = word
.filter { s -> Bool in s.rangeOfString("important") != nil }
.filter { s -> Bool in s.containsString("important") }
.flatMap { word -> Observable<JSON> in
return self.api.loadFlickrFeed("karate")
.catchError { error -> Observable<JSON> in
@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ If that doesn't work, you can continue adding more type annotations until you've
```swift
images = word
.filter { (s: String) -> Bool in s.rangeOfString("important") != nil }
.filter { (s: String) -> Bool in s.containsString("important") }
.flatMap { (word: String) -> Observable<JSON> in
return self.api.loadFlickrFeed("karate")
.catchError { (error: NSError) -> Observable<JSON> in